Sunday, July 14, 2019

Home best website best website price Top Website website review I Don't Want To Spend This Much Time On WIKIPEDIA.ORG REVIEWS. How About You?

I Don't Want To Spend This Much Time On WIKIPEDIA.ORG REVIEWS. How About You?

●

6.2 m

Optimization Opportunities

●

59.3 k

Keyword Gaps

●

6.5 k

Easy-to-Rank Keywords

●

2 k

Buyer Keywords

Keyword Opportunities

facebook

0.22%

12.21%

youtube

0.22%

world cup

0.21%

42.15%

google maps

0.18%

11.37%

google translate

0.13%

7.6%

Top Keywords

Search Traffic

This site

87.2%

Comp. Avg.

15.7%

Bounce rate

This site

60.2%

Comp. Avg.

50.2%

Sites Linking In

This site

1,242,865 Links

Comp. Avg.

2,165,862 Links

64.9

57.3

44.0

37.0

This site ranks:

in global internet engagement

4:10

Daily Time on Site

Traffic Metrics

KEYWORD OPPORTUNITIES

gmail login

yahoo mail login

facebook login

Boost traffic by filling gaps

speedtest

gogle

facebook log in

trump twitter

How to find easy keywords

best buy

teachers pay teachers

chrome web store

get out

Optimizing for buyer keywords

pokemon go gen 4 release date

0.8%

popliteus tendinitis

3.87%

popeyes biscuit

2.5%

pop up card

0.68%

Improving existing content

How to Analyze Competitor Keywords

A competitor keyword analysis is a great way to find the best keyword opportunities, and solidify your content marketing and SEO strategy.

Read

COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS

Percentage overall site traffic from each channel

% Search Social Referral Direct

wikipedia.org

87.2%

blogspot.com

30.1%

youtube.com

24.6%

facebook.com

7.9%

google.com

0.3%

How to increase search traffic

facebook.com

4.6 m

google.com

2.3 m

youtube.com

1.8 m

wikipedia.org

1.2 m

blogspot.com

12.7 k

facebook

0.22%

12.21%

youtube

0.22%

world cup

0.21%

42.15%

google maps

0.18%

11.37%

google translate

0.13%

7.6%

wikipedia.org

E-Book: Maximize Your Brand’s Competitive Potential

Competition exists in all industries. But how do you get ahead of the competition when they are working to do the same?

Download

AUDIENCE ANALYSIS

Site’s Overlap Score

64.9

57.3

44.0

37.0

35.7

Reference

Dictionaries and Encyclopedias

Extremely high

interest level

of this site's audience
visits sites in this
category.

4.4x more likely

to visit sites in this category
compared to all internet users.

Sites in this category this site’s audience visits

urbandictionary.com

thesaurus.com

britannica.com

Reference

Advice

Extremely high

interest level

of this site's audience
visits sites in this
category.

3.6x more likely

to visit sites in this category
compared to all internet users.

Sites in this category this site’s audience visits

quora.com

stackexchange.com

The Importance of Targeting in Marketing

Vague and generic messages are far less likely to resonate with audiences than specific, direct communication

Read

TRAFFIC STATISTICS

This site ranks:

In global internet traffic and engagement over the past 90 days

Alexa Rank #

90 days ago
#5

Today
#5

Country Alexa Rank

🇺🇸 United States

Improving your Alexa Rank

🇺🇸 United States

Unique Visitors

Visits

Visits per Visitor

Pageviews

Pageviews per Visit

Pageviews per Visitor

Visitors by Country

🇺🇸 United States

21.0%
🇯🇵 Japan

7.8%
🇮🇳 India

5.9%

Engagement

Past 90 Days

3.110.32%

Daily Pageviews per Visitor

4:101%

Daily Time on Site

60.2%

Bounce rate

Traffic Sources

Past 30 Days

Social

Referral

Direct

Site Flow

Past 60 Days

Visited just before

43% google.com

15.1% yandex.ru

3.04% youtube.com

2.51% google.ru

1.99% vk.com

Visited right after

29.4% google.com

10.3% yandex.ru

6.65% youtube.com

3.98% vk.com

1.69% google.ru

1,242,865 Total Sites Linking In

wikipedia.org Reviews | Scam or safe?

High Trust Rating. This Site Looks Safe To Use.

221 Reviews

LEAVE REVIEW

Trustscore

100%

MORE INFO

This webshop has not yet been claimed

CLAIM WEBSITE

High Risk

Safe

100 %

Looks Safe

Why did wikipedia.org get a high review of 100%?

Our algorithm gave the review of wikipedia.org a relatively high score. We have based this rating on the data we were able to collect about the site on the Internet such as the country in which the website is hosted, if an SSL certificate is used and reviews found on other websites.

The rating of wikipedia.org indicates the site is safe. However, we cannot guarantee that the site is a scam. Many websites look legit but are in fact fake. Before you shop at a site you do not know, check the website manually.

The remainder of this page shows all the data we were able to find which may help you review wikipedia.org to determine if it is a reliable website or a fraud.

Facts about wikipedia.org

Company data

Country Likelihood

United States: 95% / Netherlands: 5%

Webshop data

Website	wikipedia.org
Title	Wikipedia
Description	Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia, created and edited by volunteers around the world and hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation.
Website country	United States
Domain age	18 Years, 182 Days
Website Speed	Very Fast
Website value	$ 481,800,000.00

1502 Report Requests

Last updated: 11-07-2019

Refresh data

Analysis of wikipedia.org

Although this website appears to be based in United States

Consumer reviews about
wikipedia.org

based on 221 reviews

3.7

The total score is based on reviews found on the following sites

ADD A REVIEW

wikipedia.org

a truthful 2019-05-01 12:35:28

Write a review

"all of the information that they offer is biased against conservatives"

Wikipedia does offer a plethora of information. The problem is that all of the information that they offer is biased against conservatives and anyone else that loves freedom for that matter. An encyclopedia is supposed to be unbiased.

w t f stipid

i just typed in japan and it showed nothing about Japan.

I know some people who do not find it…

I know some people who do not find it reliable, but I find it very useful Every so often IK come across something i believe is incorrect and check it on other sites or source material, but generally find it is one of the most reliable sites on the internet.

everything is fine. with video games with Wikipedia.

video games is always normal Wikipedia.

Wikipedia

Wikipedia

I dont know why most rated 2 stars, but its good!

Good website but..

Allowing people to edit everything on Wikipedia makes it a pretty bad experience since there's alot of fake information.

Great website similar to a…

Great website similar to a encyclopaedia but you can edit what you like ask o a certain point.

Absolutely awful customer service…

Absolutely awful customer service experience, they block your account for no valid reasons, some kind of system robot just blocking accounts giving no valid reasons as to why, when you try to contact someone all you get is a lot of too much useless information you don't' need and nothing to help you resolve the problem, it seems there are robotic system replying to customers instead of real people on the other end, seems like to me this company is fit for nothing.

Wikipedia's credibility is at nil

Wikipedia's bio of First lady Melania Trump is riddled with half-truths and biased commentary about her citizenship and business endeavors. The tone of the bio is completely negative. Clearly, the Liberals at Wikipedia can't even spell impartiality and objectivity. Credibility and Wikipedia are a galaxy away from each other.

Wow no one seems to give a crap

Wow no one seems to give a crap about Wikipedia (IMHO). Maybe if they were fair, and honest (IMHO). Right now they come across as left wing twinks (IMHO) at least to me...That is what happens when unstable people (IMHO) are given a little power (Kinda like Pelosi, Waters, Dean) IMHO. Wikipedia...who they swapping spit with?....Hillary (IMHO)
Who is Wikipedia's competition...??
Maybe it's time to support another company...maybe one that realizes that honesty, quality, and integrity, must be applied when giving the task of documenting our lives. Please chime in...what other alternatives do we have...?
IMHO Wikipedia adds a stench to the internet, that is not easily ignored.
Time for a change. I am surprised Webster's hasn't came in and kicked the crap out of these guys (way overdue).

A lot of censorship going on behind the…

A lot of censorship going on behind the scenes.

The burning Dumpster Fire of Encyclopedias

If you get your information from here, you are in trouble.

There's so much wrong on that website - and they are proud of that, as they state in their guidelines. The editors which used to be people who knew what they were doing are now a bunch of unemployed teachers full of hate, resentment and misinformation.

They do not care. They ban everyone who disagrees, especially if they have actual knowledge backed-up with actual sources on the matter. The topic does not matter anymore either. You can become an editor if you successfully submit articles that other people find useful (or if succesfully submit changes). So as not having to share their power, no new articles from anyone other than the in-group are approved.

There have been instances of submitted articles being rejected before being copied and then posted under the account of someone from the in-group.

Wikipedia is broken. If you get your information here, you might as well get your food from a waste bin.

Sergecross73 and Ferret are destroying Wikipedia

The idea is brilliant and I love the concept of safe keeping humanity’s knowledge in a single database in which we all have grown to love. There’s an article for everything. Those who say Wikipedia is inaccurate are truly ignorant as the administration is inhumanely strict and prevents any drop of tainted information from seeing the light of days.

Having said that, I’m giving Wikimedia specifically the Wikipedia encyclopedia a one star rating. The administration is a beast — truly totalitarian and ruled by corrupt and power hungry administrators. I’m thankful they prevent vandals. I’m thankful they have the tools to correct information. But they’ve grown wicked, and if you go against their preferences in editing, they band together to prevent you from further contributing.

My experience with Wikipedia goes back to 2013. I’ve grown quite knowledgeable on the ins-and-outs of Wikipedia, the policies, and it’s guidelines. But after a long battle, the administrators prevailed in getting me banned completely. It began with one preference driven editor, then he brought out another powerful admin, the two being a famous tag team and banning people, and the rest of the administrators followed. There’s about 200 administrators and all of them seem to be chums. They do not freight about the immortality of their actions as they know they will face no consequences. They are at the top of the chain. Not even the folks of the Wikimedia Foundation — the office workers and data maintenance — have a say. I offered large sums of money to get my account back but to no avail.

I’ll let out the elephant in the room: “Sergecross73” is a wicked one. It all began when I made a BLP error in my edits. He knows that the less people contributing to Wikipedia, the more room there is to make it his own. He banned me for three days without warning.

In that time I argued with him on my talk page, and since administrators have emotions too, he obviously became angry that I went against wishes. He doesn’t want commoners disobeying him after all.

When I was finally unbanned, I went on my merry way before facing a weeklong ban without warning. Basically, Editor #1 reverted Editor #2’s BLP related edit because it didn’t contain a source. I reverted Editor #1’s reversion because Editor #2 did in fact have a source in his added information. Sergecross73 didn’t like this though... HIS preference was that Editor #2 needed to have exactly TWO citations, not just one. I didn’t know Sergecross73 had a specific quantity in mind but nonetheless I was blocked. I apologized and tried persuading Serge into realizing it was a mistake and that I’d gladly comply with anyone’s opposing views. I always have and I always would’ve. Talk pages exist for a reason. Serge doesn’t think mistakes mean anything though. Even though I accidentally went against his ways, in a technical perspective, he says “He disobeys my preferences. No matter the circumstance. He’s gone.”

The last paragraph is what lead on to over a year of constant disputes. During my week long ban I threatened to make another account and continue editing, and here’s why:

===
I love editing Wikipedia. The past few years have been amazing and I’ve had an intense care for the encyclopedia. I constantly strived to better myself and improve my edits. I fixed and revised typos, proof read, added sources, collaborated with other editors, actively used talk pages, heard all view points and rarely got into disputes. It’s become a huge hobby of mine and throughout the last year Sergecross73 became Hellbent on completely separating me from something I was passionate about. I even told him how much I loved editing but he twistedly perceived my explanation as my “vanity project” as opposed to an explanation as to why I’d never do any Wikipedia harm.

And side note, I really never have done Wikipedia harm. At all. And if I have done it harm, than it was an error and I most likely would’ve complied with the opposing viewpoint.
===

Disagreeing with the ban Sergecross73 placed on me I began leaving bluff messages on my talk page: “Fine I’ll just edit using another account.”

I then (complete bluffs:) listed a fake To Do list. “On other account: 1. Correct typos on Squirrels 2. Add citation on Beyoncé 3. Delete false information added to Physics 4. Add leah oh in NBA” etc.

Despite having no proof of my fake activity, Sergecross73 indefinitely banned me and revoked my access to my talk page. That’s it. Over 10,000 edits and three years down the drain.

Side note, Sergecross73 LOVED using past warnings against me. I was a good and honest user so I never erased things from my talk page. Sergecross73 saw the rookie mistakes I made during my first year, and some of the older warnings I received (which I in fact took to heart and used the criticism to better myself) and applied them to my most recent BLP related edit (an error) to finalize the ban.

Now it was finally time to make a new account. I know sock puppetry is the number one sin of Wikipedia but we all forget the reasons they’re placed: to prevent vandals and people who disrupt Wikipedia; NOT to eliminate users administrators have personal grudges against. It’s also a way of tracking IP activity and pinpointing all edits to one person — which is fine by me, I’d love if all my edits were pinpointed to one account, but whose fault is it that this isn’t the way things can be?

Using my first sock account, I built up quite a reputation. I got a few barn stars and had hundreds of edits — MOSTLY just being typo fixes and citation related. Sergecross73 somehow found out my account had similar activity to my original and blocked the account, even though there wasn’t any malice there.

The cycle continued over and over again. Many accounts down the drain. “Chrissymad” who isn’t an administrator joined the bandwagon and treated it as a game, creating a “sock drawer” and using petty insults against me despite my gentle nature. Quite the trash talker. The only administrators more notorious than Sergecross73, “Ferret” joined around this time. I can see why Wikipedia user Ferret has such a simple name: all of the hate pages and complaints online about Sergecross73’s tyranny will trace back to him, but Googling “ferret” won’t necessarily bring up the Wikipedia editor now will it?

Ferret all of the sudden began adding potential sock puppets that weren’t even ME to the sock drawer and now I was being blamed for edits (by the way, most of which didn’t even seem harmful) that weren’t even MINE. He didn’t even use IP-technology, he just saw that people were attempting to edit typos I was trying to edit, and the dude hates my guts so much (due to an argument we had) that he doesn’t care who gets injured along the way, as long as there’s no chance I get to engage in something I love.

I asked my friend to log on her computer and try making some typo fixes that were bugging me but she got banned too. She was enthusiastic about trying Wikipedia but her plans to edit articles that were of her interest was stunted and she didn’t have a chance to be a part of the community because ferret saw that she had relations with me and thus wasn’t worthy of contributing.

Over the course of my time on Wikipedia, I was thrilled to contribute photography of my own to various articles. An article about dogs that had no photos now had a beautifully taken photo of a dog that met all the relevancy of the article. And so on. Ferret took it upon myself to get every last photo I’d uploaded to Wikimedia Commons taken down on grounds that they A. belonged to a sock, B. were low quality (which they weren’t by any means), and C. weren’t mine — he backed up this claim in saying a few of them were screenshots. Which they were, I emailed photos from my phone and camera to myself, and downloading them takes awhile so I used the application “Screensaver” to quickly instill them within my files. Ferret is cruel, every photo I ever uploaded was removed and all articles that had a picture of mine were affected.

Ferret is also slanderous. He told various people that my sole intention of contributing to Wikipedia is “putting pictures of my friends on Wikipedia articles”, which is outrageous. I took a picture of a mountain — clear, relevant, and the only photo on the page — but since my friend was standing there, smiling, in the bottom left corner, it could back up his slanderous claim. Ferret said the same for other pictures. One article was about genetics and I was attempting to show the correlation in facial features of sisters. One article was about facial scarring and I took a cool picture that went well with a paragraph. I uploaded some clear and concise sports photos too. Nonetheless Ferret began disregarding my original BLP related errors and began telling administrators “this guy uses socks to upload photos of his friends to Wikipedia”. All administrators mindlessly believe each other without a second thought so what was I supposed to do?

/// Apparently there's a character limit so here: https:// docs . google . com/document/d/1-4anInEXv6fQGM_MgrG5jHjkU1IF_QrpdCZX30-WJYA/edit?usp=sharing. /// Links aren't allow so I had to adjust the format of the one to my Google doc. Just get rid of some spaces for full story. ///

Good Wiki

It is a habit for me to get information from Wikipedia!

Some content editors is really good and some are just bad.

But still I think it's the best source for information! :)

Source for Casual Use & General Knowledge

The content in Wikipedia cannot be cited as coming from a reliable source. It keeps getting edited by any random user. All being said, Wikipedia.org is a good source of information and getting a general idea about the trillions of subjects around the globe.

arrogant bunch

Snobby volunteers who sit on their thrones of rightiousness. Cant even delete my account because apparently their quest for the truth goes above my right to privacy.

Helpful at most times

Helpful at most times. I used to just read on wikipedia all day when I was still in University.

Registrar Info

Name

MarkMonitor, Inc.

Whois Server

whois.markmonitor.com

Referral URL

http://www.markmonitor.com

Status

clientDeleteProhibited (https://www.icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited)
clientTransferProhibited (https://www.icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited)
clientUpdateProhibited (https://www.icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited)

Important Dates

Expires On

2023-01-12

Registered On

2001-01-13

Updated On

2015-12-12

Name Servers

Similar Domains

Registrar Data

We will display stored WHOIS data for up to 30 days.
refresh

Make Private Now

Domain Name: wikipedia.org
Registry Domain ID: D51687756-LROR
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.markmonitor.com
Registrar URL: http://www.markmonitor.com
Updated Date: 2015-12-12T02:16:20-0800
Creation Date: 2001-01-12T16:12:14-0800
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2023-01-12T00:00:00-0800
Registrar: MarkMonitor, Inc.
Registrar IANA ID: 292
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: 
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.2083895740
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited (https://www.icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited)
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited (https://www.icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited)
Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited (https://www.icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited)
Registrant Organization: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
Registrant State/Province: CA
Registrant Country: US
Admin Organization: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
Admin State/Province: CA
Admin Country: US
Tech Organization: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
Tech State/Province: CA
Tech Country: US
Name Server: ns0.wikimedia.org
Name Server: ns2.wikimedia.org
Name Server: ns1.wikimedia.org
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System: http://wdprs.internic.net/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2019-07-07T01:06:29-0700 <<<

For more information on WHOIS status codes, please visit:
  https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/epp-status-codes

If you wish to contact this domain’s Registrant, Administrative, or Technical
contact, and such email address is not visible above, you may do so via our web
form, pursuant to ICANN’s Temporary Specification. To verify that you are not a
robot, please enter your email address to receive a link to a page that
facilitates email communication with the relevant contact(s).

Web-based WHOIS:
  https://domains.markmonitor.com/whois

If you have a legitimate interest in viewing the non-public WHOIS details, send
your request and the reasons for your request to 
and specify the domain name in the subject line. We will review that request and
may ask for supporting documentation and explanation.

The data in MarkMonitor’s WHOIS database is provided for information purposes,
and to assist persons in obtaining information about or related to a domain
name’s registration record. While MarkMonitor believes the data to be accurate,
the data is provided "as is" with no guarantee or warranties regarding its
accuracy.

By submitting a WHOIS query, you agree that you will use this data only for
lawful purposes and that, under no circumstances will you use this data to:
  (1) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission by email, telephone,
or facsimile of mass, unsolicited, commercial advertising, or spam; or
  (2) enable high volume, automated, or electronic processes that send queries,
data, or email to MarkMonitor (or its systems) or the domain name contacts (or
its systems).

MarkMonitor.com reserves the right to modify these terms at any time.

By submitting this query, you agree to abide by this policy.

MarkMonitor is the Global Leader in Online Brand Protection.

MarkMonitor Domain Management(TM)
MarkMonitor Brand Protection(TM)
MarkMonitor AntiCounterfeiting(TM)
MarkMonitor AntiPiracy(TM)
MarkMonitor AntiFraud(TM)
Professional and Managed Services

Visit MarkMonitor at https://www.markmonitor.com
Contact us at +1.8007459229
In Europe, at +44.02032062220
--


Information Updated: 2019-07-07 08:13:56






wikipedia.org Website Analysis

You can find the website value, revenue, visits & pageviews estimates, Alexa Traffic Rank & charts, and Worth Of Web Rank for wikipedia.org on this page. 

There are six sections on our website analysis reports. Check these sections below. Inside a section, you will find the data and related actions you can take.














Analyze another website:














The report below is up-to-date.









Accuracy Of Our Calculator

Please check our detailed explanation to understand how this automated calculator works and how accurate it is. 

If you are about to sell or buy a website/web-based business, please check our "Sell a Website" or "Buy a Website" pages and contact us. For qualified sellers and buyers, our licensed exit consultants can provide an accurate evaluation and point you in the right direction for free.









Sections

You can jump to the sections below using these links.

How much is wikipedia.org worth?
How much can this website make?
Website Traffic Estimate
Search Engines & Social Media
User Experience (UX) & User Interface (UI)
Domain & Hosting










How much is wikipedia.org worth?

In this section, you can find the estimated website value for wikipedia.org in US Dollars. We calculate it based on our estimation for daily, monthly, and annual revenue. You can view these revenue figures in the next section. 

Worth Of Web Rank is a score to compare a website with the best websites in the world.









Data






Estimated worth of this website:

$12,000,000,000







Worth Of Web Rank

98%


















Action




Sell your website/web-based business:

Do you have a money-making website/web-based business? Do you want to sell it now for top dollar with our licensed website broker team? (Nous parlons aussi français!)




Buy a website/web-based business:

Are you looking to buy a money-making website/web-based business? Find the perfect online business today with our licensed website broker team. (Nous parlons aussi français!)






Do you want to find the most profitable keywords for your website? Search Engine Optimization (SEO) and Search Engine Marketing (SEM) analysis:

Do you want to perform an in-depth SEO & SEM analysis for a keyword, website or competitor?
Do you want to find the daily SERP volatility data for various search engines?




Domain and hosting:

Use our domain name availability checker to find and register your next domain
Complete web hosting solution only for $3.95/month (Free domain; free SSL; free site builders; 1-click WordPress install; and more.)
Check out the best promotions and coupon codes of this week!



















How much can this website make?

In this section, you can find the estimated revenue of wikipedia.org in US Dollars. 

We use our traffic estimation to calculate “potential” advertising revenue of a website. We know that every website is unique. 

Some sell stuff online which is impossible for us to know how much they make. Some do not use advertising or any other type of revenue source, so our figures will show only the potential of that website. We “assume” that the website is using ads and affiliate programs to make money. 

You can see the estimated website traffic numbers in the next section.









Data






Estimated revenue per day:

$3,899,999







Estimated revenue per month:

$116,999,970







Estimated revenue per year:

$1,403,999,640














Action




Sell your website/web-based business:

Do you have a money-making website/web-based business? Do you want to sell it now for top dollar with our licensed website broker team? (Nous parlons aussi français!)




Do you want to find the most profitable keywords for your website? Search Engine Optimization (SEO) and Search Engine Marketing (SEM) analysis:

Do you want to perform an in-depth SEO & SEM analysis for a keyword, website or competitor?
Do you want to find the daily SERP volatility data for various search engines?






Make more money online:

Check Propeller Ads (AdSense alternative, plus 5% referral program)
Check Infolinks (AdSense alternative, plus 10% referral program)
Check TransferWise (the cheapest international money transfer, plus free transfer with this link)




Increase your website traffic, pageviews and Alexa Rank:

Check webmaster marketplace for various traffic offers
Check MaxVisits



















Website Traffic Estimate

In this section, you can find the website traffic estimate of wikipedia.org. 

We use public traffic ranking data to start with our calculations. We use Alexa Traffic Rank to estimate the traffic figures below; visits and pageviews. You can find the Alexa Rank of this website in the next section.









Data






Estimated visits per day:

260,000,000





Estimated pageviews per day:

1,299,999,896







Estimated visits per month:

7,800,000,000





Estimated pageviews per month:

38,999,996,880







Estimated visits per year:

93,600,000,000





Estimated pageviews per year:

467,999,962,560














Action




Increase your website traffic, pageviews and Alexa Rank:

Check webmaster marketplace for various traffic offers
Check MaxVisits




Make more money online:

Check Propeller Ads (AdSense alternative, plus 5% referral program)
Check Infolinks (AdSense alternative, plus 10% referral program)
Check TransferWise (the cheapest international money transfer, plus free transfer with this link)






Do you want to find the most profitable keywords for your website? Search Engine Optimization (SEO) and Search Engine Marketing (SEM) analysis:

Do you want to perform an in-depth SEO & SEM analysis for a keyword, website or competitor?
Do you want to find the daily SERP volatility data for various search engines?




Domain and hosting:

Use our domain name availability checker to find and register your next domain
Complete web hosting solution only for $3.95/month (Free domain; free SSL; free site builders; 1-click WordPress install; and more.)
Check out the best promotions and coupon codes of this week!



















Search Engines & Social Media

In this section, you can find the Alexa Rank of wikipedia.org, related graphs, and useful links to boost your search engine optimization, search engine marketing, and social media work. 

Alexa Rank is a classification that ranks websites globally according to their traffic estimate. The website with the highest traffic has a rank of "1" whereas the websites with the lowest traffic have a rank around "30M" and more ("more" means you will not have an Alexa Rank because they do not keep a rank for the websites with negligible traffic).









Data






Alexa Global Rank for the last 3 months:

5







wikipedia.org Alexa Daily Traffic Rank Trend Graph (3 Months)









wikipedia.org Alexa Search Visits Percent Graph (3 Months)
















Action




Do you want to find the most profitable keywords for your website? Search Engine Optimization (SEO) and Search Engine Marketing (SEM) analysis:

Do you want to perform an in-depth SEO & SEM analysis for a keyword, website or competitor?
Do you want to find the daily SERP volatility data for various search engines?




Backlink Analysis:

Analyze all your backlinks in detail
Check Google, last 24 hours
Check Google, last week
Check Google, last month
Check Google, all time




See the information that is used when your website content is shared:

Check Facebook Sharing Debugger
Check Twitter Card Validator




Google Rich Snippets:

Google Structured Data Testing Tool
Google Rich Results Test






wikipedia.org in search engine indexes:

Check in Google index
Check in DuckDuckGo index
Check in Bing index
Check in Yahoo index
Check in Yandex index
Check in Baidu index




Webmaster tools:

Google Search Console (Webmaster Tools)
Bing - Webmaster Tools (Yahoo! Site Explorer)
Yandex.Webmaster
Baidu Webmaster Tools




Increase your backlinks:

Check webmaster marketplace for various link building offers
Check webmaster marketplace for various directory submission offers




Increase your social media followers, subscribers, views and shares:

Check webmaster marketplace for various social media offers















User Experience (UX) & User Interface (UI)

If you are trying to improve your user interfaces and provide a better experience for your users, you can find the related links in this section.









Action




Is wikipedia.org mobile-friendly?

Google Mobile-Friendly Test




Increase your page speed for better user experience:

Measure with Google PageSpeed Insights
Measure with Pingdom Website Speed Test
Measure with GTmetrix
Measure with WebPageTest




Google User Experience Reports:

Ad Experience Report (Desktop)
Ad Experience Report (Mobile)
Abusive Experiences




wikipedia.org at different screen resolutions:

Test your website at different screen resolutions




Browser compatibility test:

Cross platform browser test




Validate HTML, CSS, RSS Markup for wikipedia.org:

W3C Complete Test (Unicorn)






Follow web design changes of wikipedia.org over time:

Previous web designs of this website




All-in-one online marketing platform to grow your business:

Do you want to use an all-in-one online marketing platform? (email marketing, landing pages, webinars, & marketing automation)




Content is king:

Check webmaster marketplace for various article creation offers
Check webmaster marketplace for various video creation offers
Check webmaster marketplace for various audio and music creation offers
Check webmaster marketplace for various data entry offers
Check webmaster marketplace for various programming offers




Beautiful custom design can complete your content:

Check webmaster marketplace for various design offers




Are you happy with your current logo?

Check webmaster marketplace for various logo offers















Domain & Hosting

You can find useful links about domain names and web hosting in this section.









Action




Domain and hosting:

Use our domain name availability checker to find and register your next domain
Complete web hosting solution only for $3.95/month (Free domain; free SSL; free site builders; 1-click WordPress install; and more.)
Check out the best promotions and coupon codes of this week!




Owner of this domain, domain registration / expiration date, domain age, server info:

Check WHOIS data of this domain




DNS (Domain Name System) records of this domain:

Check DNS records & IP status




Check HTTP status codes and redirects:

Check HTTP status codes, response headers, and redirect chains






Check your SSL settings:

Perform a deep analysis of the configuration of any SSL web server




Check the status of your website from different international locations:

Ping a server or website using a network of over 70 monitoring stations worldwide




Protect yourself and hide your online presence throughout your devices:

Use a VPN for increased security and anonymity




WOW Score:

 wikipedia.org : 4.88 out of 5

Breaking

Sunday, July 14, 2019

I Don't Want To Spend This Much Time On WIKIPEDIA.ORG REVIEWS. How About You?

KEYWORD OPPORTUNITIES BREAKDOWN

COMPARISON METRICS

Search Traffic

Bounce rate

Sites Linking In

SIMILAR SITES BY AUDIENCE OVERLAP

ALEXA RANK 90 DAY TREND

KEYWORD OPPORTUNITIES

Keyword Gaps

Easy-to-Rank Keywords

Buyer Keywords

Optimization Opportunities

How to Analyze Competitor Keywords

COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS

Traffic Sources

Referral Sites

Top Keywords

E-Book: Maximize Your Brand’s Competitive Potential

AUDIENCE ANALYSIS

Audience Overlap

Site's Audience Interests

The Importance of Targeting in Marketing

TRAFFIC STATISTICS

Alexa Rank Estimate

Unique Visitors Estimate

Audience Geography Estimate

Site Metrics Estimate

Engagement

Traffic Sources

Site Flow

wikipedia.org Reviews | Scam or safe?

Why did wikipedia.org get a high review of 100%?

Facts about wikipedia.org

Company data

Webshop data

Analysis of wikipedia.org

Consumer reviews aboutwikipedia.org

wikipedia.org

Wikipedia

Reviews 95

wikipedia.org Website Analysis

Accuracy Of Our Calculator

Sections

How much is wikipedia.org worth?

Data

Action

How much can this website make?

Data

Action

Website Traffic Estimate

Data

Action

Search Engines & Social Media

Data

Action

User Experience (UX) & User Interface (UI)

Action

Domain & Hosting

Action

No comments:

Subscribe To

Md Hridoy Hossain

Social Media Icons

Today Visitor

T-Shirt

Play Online Live

Socialize

Categories

Popular

Recent

Comment

Post Top Ad

Recent

Sports

Contributors

Like US On Facebook

My Website Menu

Alexa Rank
Estimate

Unique Visitors
Estimate

Audience Geography
Estimate

Site Metrics
Estimate

Consumer reviews about
wikipedia.org